Crypto NewsNewsThe First 32,000 Blocks of the Ripple (XRP) Network Are Missing: Ripple...

The First 32,000 Blocks of the Ripple (XRP) Network Are Missing: Ripple Manager Makes a Statement

Ripple CTO David Schwartz spoke about the network's first 32,000 blocks being missing in his statement.

Follow Bitcoin Sistemi Google News Button

Ripple's chief technology officer (CTO) David Schwartz made important statements regarding the block loss issue in the XRP Ledger, which has resurfaced in the XRP community.

Schwartz stated that there was a software error during the initial development phase and approximately 32,000 blocks were lost because of it.

The XRP Ledger, the blockchain network that underpins the XRP coin, does not contain data from the first 32,000 blocks. This has led to some claims that the block records may have been intentionally deleted. Regarding this loss, which sparked debate within the community, Schwartz maintained in a social media post that the block loss in question was not intentional.

Related News  Critical Levels in Bitcoin Have Been Set - What Levels Must Be Exceeded for an Explosive Uptrend? What Level Is Important to Prevent a Decline?

Schwartz said, “Existing data wasn't deleted to prevent further loss. There was no way to recover the lost data.” He also responded to the question of why the blockchain wasn't reset at the time: “Resetting the blockchain would have erased all data beyond block 32,000, rather than ensuring the integrity of the data.”

Records on the XRP Ledger currently begin at block number 32,570, meaning that approximately 32,000 blocks from the first 10 days of the blockchain—a significant transaction history—have been irretrievably lost.

Schwartz stated that this technical issue was first raised in May, and that the data loss occurred due to a software error while testing several ledger streams during early development. Although a plan to reset the system was made after the error was identified, this step was never implemented.

As a result, the Ripple team decided to continue the system in its current form to ensure the security of subsequent blocks, even at the cost of losing the first ones.

*This is not investment advice.

Follow our Telegram and Twitter account now for exclusive news, analytics and on-chain data!
guest

0 Comments
Latest
The oldest Top Rated
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Popular Posts of the Week