Crypto NewsBitcoinOne of the People Closest to Satoshi Nakamoto: “Adam Back Is Not...

One of the People Closest to Satoshi Nakamoto: “Adam Back Is Not Satoshi”

Adam Back, the administrator of the mailing list where Satoshi Nakamoto announced Bitcoin, denied the allegations.

Follow Bitcoin Sistemi Google News Button

As debates surrounding the identity of Bitcoin founder Satoshi Nakamoto reignite in the cryptocurrency world, recent claims suggest that Adam Back may be the person behind this identity.

Following these allegations, Perry E. Metzger, one of the administrators of the cryptography mailing list that played a critical role in Bitcoin’s early days, made noteworthy statements on the matter.

Metzger stated that he managed the email list in question and knew many of the names on it well, adding that it “doesn’t seem likely” that Adam Back is Satoshi Nakamoto. He argued that Back was the latest addition to a long list of names that many journalists had incorrectly identified as “definite Satoshi” in the past.

Metzger, who specifically avoided speculating about Satoshi’s identity, pointed out that such speculation could have serious consequences. He stated that pointing fingers at someone could lead to that person facing risks such as their family being kidnapped for the rest of their life, adding, “They could become targets for wealth they don’t actually possess.”

Related News  Bitcoin Surpasses $72,000: There Are Signs of a Ceasefire Between Israel and Lebanon

Metzger also reminded that Satoshi Nakamoto has not harmed the world to date, has not moved the Bitcoin assets under his control, and has consciously chosen to remain anonymous, arguing that this anonymity should be respected. He noted that those wrongly accused in the past have also suffered serious hardships, citing as an example the difficulties faced by the family of Hal Finney, who is battling ALS.

Metzger also stated that he doesn’t believe frequently mentioned names like Nick Szabo and Hal Finney are Satoshi, adding that such claims are often based on weak evidence. He explained that analyzing the correspondence styles of hundreds of people on the mailing list and presenting coincidental similarities as “evidence” is a flawed approach.

*This is not investment advice.

Follow our Telegram and Twitter account now for exclusive news, analytics and on-chain data!
guest

0 Comments
Latest
The oldest Top Rated
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Popular Posts of the Week